Ruth v. Imperial Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying Albert and Norma Ruths’ petition for declaratory judgment.
The Ruths claim that they and residents of their household under 21 years of age were insureds under a standard homeowner’s insurance policy issued by Imperial Insurance Company, and that the policy included the usual duty to defend any suit alleging personal injury and damages brought on by negligence of the named insureds as well as an obligation to pay all sums that they may become legally obligated to pay up to TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($25,000.00). The policy expressly…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, New Jersey v. BurchTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Sherman v. Provident American Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Luvual v. Henke & Pillot, Division of the Kroger Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Kirk v. Standard Life and Accident Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1972
- Wren v. HowlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bormaster v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- State Bar of Texas v. Grossenbacher, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
- Freeport Operators, Inc. v. Home Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984