Legal Opinion

State v. Amerson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 2008No. 27989PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JEFFREY W. BATES, Judge.

Antonio Amerson (Defendant) contends the trial court erred in permitting the State to waive its final peremptory challenge so as to exclude Charles Jones (Jones), an African-American vernireper-son, from the jury. Defendant argues that, for the reasons articulated in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), the State’s action violated the rights of Jones and Defendant to equal protection. This Court affirms.

Defendant was charged by amended information with committing the class B felony of possessing a controlled substance with the intent…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  5. State v. StrongSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DeanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. State v. GottMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. RoweMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Amerson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. People v. LuceroColorado Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API