Legal Opinion

Fultz v. Neighborhood Legal Services

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 26, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-115PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHILL, Chief Judge.

Presently before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s pro se complaint which seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages for alleged violations of the civil rights of the plaintiff, Mrs. Ernestine A. Fultz. Because matters outside the pleadings have been presented to the Court and considered by it, we will construe defendants’ motion to dismiss as one for summary judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), 56; Sayers v. Automated Transportation, Inc., 645 F.Supp. 194, 196 (W.D.Pa.1986). We conclude that plaintiff has been given a reasonable opportunity to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Guilford County Community Action Program, Inc. v. WilsonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
  2. ROBINSON v. PATHWAY TO HOUSINGDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. Stengel v. City of ColumbusDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API