Legal Opinion

Summit v. Comm'n, Env't Protection, No. Cv91 050 26 43 (Jul. 20, 1992)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 20, 1992No. CV91 050 26 43Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION This is an appeal from the denial of an application by the plaintiff to the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection for a water quality certificate required for a CT Page 6800 federal license under section 401 of the federal Clean Water Act. The plaintiff, Summit Hydropower (hereafter called "Summit"), is a Connecticut partnership based in Woodstock, Connecticut. Summit has a proposed hydroelectric project on the Quinebaug River at Cargill Falls in Putnam, Connecticut. The federal…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. City of Milwaukee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. First Iowa Hydro-Electric Cooperative v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API