Legal Opinion

Parsons v. Van Wyck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1900PublishedCited by 10 opinions

-Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Mary L. Parsons against RobertA. .Van Wyck and others. Prom an order denying a motion to continue an injunction pendente lite, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

The action was brought by a taxpayer to restrain an alleged unlawful expenditure of city money by the defendants-as members of the “Sailors’ and Soldiers’ Memorial Arch Commission of the City of New York,” provided for by chapter 522 of the Laws of 1893, in erecting a proposed memorial monument in Riverside Park near Eighty-Ninth street. A temporary injunction was obtained, but a motion to continue it pendente lite was denied, and from the order entered thereon this appeal is taken.

The act in question, under which the defendants are proceeding (chapter 522, Laws 1893), is as follows:

“An act…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. In Re Niagara Falls & Whirlpool Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. The People Ex Rel. Murphy v. . KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Weismer v. . Village of DouglasNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  5. Mead v. Inhabitants of ActonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Slavich v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Lowe v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Hill v. RobertsTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State Ex Rel. Singelmann v. MorrisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Eastern Connecticut Cable Television, Inc. v. Town of MontvilleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API