Hill v. Roberts
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM DAVIDSON. Appeal fro mtlie Chancery Court of Davidson County. —Horn John T. Lillyett, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gbeen
This suit was brought to test the constitutionality of certain acts of the legislature under which the State of Tennessee, Davidson county, and the city of Nashville were authorized to issue bonds for the purpose of laying out and constructing a memorial to our soldiers and sailors of the late war with Germany. The chancellor upheld the acts of the legislature drawn in question, but in his decree placed certain restrictions around the application of the proceeds of the bonds to he issued by Davidson county and the city of Nashville. The complainants appealed from that part of the decree…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daggett v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Kingman v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- State ex rel. Bell v. CummingsTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- Demoville & Co. v. Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
- Quinn v. HesterTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Curtis Myers v. Amisub (SFH), Inc., d/b/a St. Francis HospitalTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Slavich v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Hancock v. Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
- Allied Architects' Ass'n of Los Angeles v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.