Legal Opinion

Amalfitano v. Baker

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 16, 2001No. 594, 2000PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Justice:

Donna Amalfitano, plaintiff-below, appeals the order of the Superior Court denying her Motion for a New Trial. At trial she sought compensation for injuries she claims occurred as the result of a 1997 automobile collision. The defendant admitted liability and the parties submitted the case to a jury on the issue of damages alone. After two days of testimony, the jury returned an award of zero damages for Amalfitano. The trial judge denied her motion for a new trial, finding that the jury could have reasonably determined that the 1997 accident did not proximately cause her…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Culver v. BennettSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  2. Breeding v. Contractors-One-Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  3. Storey v. CamperSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  4. Money v. Manville Corp. Asbestos Disease Compensation Trust FundSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  5. Maier v. SantucciSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Chrysler Corp. v. Chaplake Holdings, Ltd.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  2. Dunn v. RileySupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  3. Lang v. MorantSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  4. Reinco, Inc. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  5. Burkett-Wood v. HainesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API