Legal Opinion

State v. Wells

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 1, 2001No. 00-485PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant Kim Wells appeals from a district court decision suspending her driver’s license after a civil suspension merits hearing pursuant to 23 V.S.A. § 1205. She contends that the district eoui't (1) erroneously applied the burden of proof in weighing her claim that the Datamaster breath analysis test does not comply with the performance standards of the Heath Department breath analysis rules, and (2) erred in concluding that the evidence submitted below was sufficient to find that the Datamaster complies with pertinent Health Department breath analysis rules. We affirm.

At approximately…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RolfeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  2. State v. PlutaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. VezinaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  2. State v. EsserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. State v. BurnettSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. State v. GrenierSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  5. State of Arizona v. John Robert EsserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API