Legal Opinion
State v. Grenier
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided November 14, 2014No. 2013-224PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.
¶ 1. These consolidated cases stem from defendants Brian Grenier and Jessica Harris’s prosecutions for driving under the influence (DUI). 2 Defendants appeal the trial court’s denial of their motions to suppress the results of their breath-alcohol tests taken by the DataMaster DMT machine. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court.
¶2. We begin with the procedural history. Defendants Grenier and Harris were arrested for driving under the influence on May 22, 2010 and February 8, 2011, respectively. Defendants moved to suppress the evidentiary breath-alcohol test results, arguing (1)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re Agency of Administration, Etc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- State v. ZaccaroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Conservation Law Foundation v. BurkeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- In re Williston Inn GroupSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vermont National Telephone Company v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- In re Edwin A. Towne, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- State v. Aita GurungSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025
- State v. Paul AikenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015