Legal Opinion

Maksin v. United Steel Workers of America

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 2000No. CIV. A. 99-1215PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER OF COURT

AMBROSE, District Judge.

Pending before this court are two Motions for Summary Judgment by Defendants United States Steel and the United Steelworkers of America, Local 2227. For the reasons set forth below, the Motions are GRANTED in their entirety.

I. INTRODUCTION

A. Factual Background

This is a “hybrid § 301” action brought by Plaintiff James Maksin under the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, against Plaintiffs employer, United States Steel, a division of USX Corporation (“USS”), for breach of three agreements allegedly controlling overtime provisions at…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Keister v. PPL Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. MEDLEY v. ATLANTIC EXPOSITION SERVICES, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API