Legal Opinion

United States v. Walters

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided November 1, 2007No. 6:06-cv-00149PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TELAD HEARTFIELD, District Judge.

Defendant Louis Walters moves to suppress incriminating evidence obtained during a search of his residence.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Earl S. Hines, United States magistrate judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. Judge Hines concluded that there was no unreasonable search or seizure, and therefore recommended that the motion to suppress be denied..

Defendant objects to the magistrate judge’s…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. RedmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  2. State v. GaryOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Daniel Ray Parisher v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
  4. Daniel Ray Parisher v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
  5. People v. RedmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API