Legal Opinion

People v. Redman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 31, 2008No. 4-06-0180PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Myerscough

In January 2006, the trial court granted defendant Ronald L. Red-man’s motion to suppress. The State appeals, arguing the court erred because (1) the evidence soon would have been found by lawful means, unrelated to the alleged misconduct; (2) the officers had reasonable suspicion that defendant, who was on probation, was involved in manufacturing methamphetamine and, therefore, the officers could lawfully search defendant and the residence; (3) the officers proceeded reasonably and with greater restraint than called for by the fourth amendment; (4) the officers had probable cause to arrest…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. WoodromeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  2. People v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  3. People v. HopsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  4. People v. CannonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  5. People v. KofronAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API