People v. Redman
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Myerscough
In January 2006, the trial court granted defendant Ronald L. Red-man’s motion to suppress. The State appeals, arguing the court erred because (1) the evidence soon would have been found by lawful means, unrelated to the alleged misconduct; (2) the officers had reasonable suspicion that defendant, who was on probation, was involved in manufacturing methamphetamine and, therefore, the officers could lawfully search defendant and the residence; (3) the officers proceeded reasonably and with greater restraint than called for by the fourth amendment; (4) the officers had probable cause to arrest…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. WoodromeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- People v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
- People v. HopsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- People v. CannonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- People v. KofronAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.