Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Southern California Edison Co. v. Gemmill

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1938No. Civ. 2193PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The plaintiff brought five separate actions in eminent domain to acquire an easement 150 feet in width across the properties of the respective defendants for the purpose of constructing, maintaining and operating electric power lines, with the usual right of ingress and egress in connection with such construction, maintenance and operation. The five causes were consolidated for trial and tried before the same court and jury. Verdicts were returned fixing the compensation to be awarded to the respective defendants, covering both the value of the' easement sought to be condemned and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fisher v. ZimmermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Rosenberg v. Geo. A. Moore & Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Koyer v. McComberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Baker v. Board of Trustees, Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Drathman v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. People v. Al. G. Smith Co. Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Retlaw Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Ganahl v. Certain IndividualsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Gerlach v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API