Legal Opinion
Applera Corp. v. MJ Research, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 3, 2004No. 3:98CV1201(JBA)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruling on Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence or Argument by Defendants Regarding Customer Class Exemptions [Doc. # 762-4]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs move pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 402 and 403 to preclude defendants from presenting evidence or arguing at trial that certain classes of MJ’s thermal cycler customers and certain uses of MJ’s thermal cyclers by MJ’s customers are exempt from liability for direct infringement of the patents-in-suit, and that, as a result of these exemptions, defendants also are exempt from liability for inducing these customers to infringe the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Standard Havens Products, Inc. v. Gencor Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Embrex, Inc. v. Service Engineering Corp. And Edward G. Bounds, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Toxgon Corporation v. Bnfl, Inc., and Gts Duratek (Now Known as Duratek, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Madey v. Duke UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
- Vanocur Refractories, LLC v. Fosbel, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025