Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist
In 1992, Congress amended the patent laws and expressly abrogated the States’ sovereign immunity from claims of patent infringement. Respondent College Savings then sued the State of Florida for patent infringement, and the Court of Appeals held that Congress had validly abrogated the State’s sovereign immunity from infringement suits pursuant to its authority under § 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. We hold that, under City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U. S. 507 (1997), the statute cannot be sustained as legislation enacted to enforce the guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by426 opinions
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Tennessee v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
421 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.