Drutis v. Rand McNally & Co.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TODD, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Larry Drutis, Harold E. Parker, Joe Tkacz, and John Wayne Simpson, present and retired employees1 of Rand McNally & Company (hereafter “Rand McNally”), and/or its successors, World Color Press, Inc. (hereafter “World Color”) and Quebecor World (USA), Inc., (hereafter “Quebecor”), bring this action against defendants Rand McNally and Quebecor, pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., (“ERISA”), alleging that their pension benefits have decreased or will…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- In Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Fund, Inc. v. Oppenheimer & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- McHugh v. Olympia Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Essex Builders Group, Inc. v. Amerisure InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McKinney/Pearl Restaurant Partners, L.P. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2016
- Advantage Industrial Systems, LLC v. Aleris Rolled Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
- Cahoo v. SAS Analytics Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Christopher Scott Merrill v. Mark King, Mark Cooks, Stacy Lindahl, and John DoeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Eckles v. Archer-Daniels-Midland CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.