Legal Opinion
Eckles v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided March 6, 2024No. 5:21-cv-00046Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY PADUCAH DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:21-CV-00046-BJB-HBB MELISSA ECKLES PLAINTIFF VS. ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY d/b/a ADM and AMERICAN RIVER TRANSPORTATION CO., LLC d/b/a ARTCO DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Melissa Eckles’ motion to compel discovery information from Defendant American River Transportation Co., LLC (“ARTCo”) (DN 106). ARTCo has responded in opposition (DN 111), and Eckles has replied (DN 113). Nature of the Case This is a Jones Act and Maritime case. Eckles was employed as a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sharon Surles, by Next Friend Jayneice Johnson, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Jones v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Gruenbaum v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc. v. PaasDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.