Legal Opinion

Cahoo v. SAS Analytics Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 28, 2020No. 2:17-cv-10657Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PATTI JOE CAHOO, KRYSTEN MENDYK, KHADIJA COLE, HYON PAK and MICHELLE DAVISON, Plaintiffs, No. 17-10657 v. District Judge David M. Lawson Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen FAST ENTERPRISES, LLC, CSG GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, STEVEN GESKEY, SHEMIM BLUDELL, DORRIS MITCHELL, DEBRA SINGLETON, SHARON MOFFET-MASSEY, SAS INSTITUTE, INC., and MICHIGAN DEPT. OF TECHNOLOGY AND BUDGET, Defendants. / OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant SAS Institute, Inc’s (“SAS’s”) Renewed Motion to Deem Admitted SAS’s First Requests for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Foretich v. ChungDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
  2. Drutis v. Rand McNally & Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API