Henshaw v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance Co.
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Lively, Judge :
A jury found for plaintiff on a former trial; judgment was rendered thereon by a special judge, from which defendant prosecuted error to this court and obtained reversal because of error in the instructions. Henshaw v. Fire Ins. Co., 109 W. Va. 235, 153 S. E. 512. Upon new trial, May 9, 1931, a jury was waived and the case submitted to the regular judge, upon the evidence taken at the first trial before the special judge, who rendered judgment for plaintiff for $10,775.75, and defendant again prosecutes error.
The issue raised by- defendant’s special pleas is that Swearingen,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Owings v. HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
- Laidley v. Kline's Adm'rWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
- Thompson v. Laboringman's Mercantile & Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Truslow v. Parkersburg Bridge & Terminal RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
- Horner v. AmickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kauf v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1946
- Crusenberry v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
- Crusenberry v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
- Tweel v. West Virginia Racing CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
- Tweel v. West Virginia Racing CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.