Kauf v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, District Judge.
This is an action for malicious prosecution in which a jury returned a verdict against both defendants in the amount of $1,500. Defendants have moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and in the alternative to set aside the verdict and grant them a new trial. Several grounds are mentioned in support of their motion, none of which I consider to be meritorious except the one relating to the authority of defendants’ agents to bind the defendants by the agents’ participation in the alleged malicious prosecution.
At the trial of the case I gave a charge to the jury,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Markley v. SnowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- McKain v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
- Lyons v. Davy-Pocahontas Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
- Central Railway Co. v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
- Fetty v. Huntington Loan Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Leopold Williams, as personal representative of the Estate of Williams v. Cost-U-Less, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2026