Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Doe

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1992No. 15951PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The Family Court of the Third Circuit entered a decree adjudging that Doe, a minor, was a law violator within the purview of Hawai‘i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 571-11(1) (1985) for, inter alia, driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DUI) in violation of HRS § 291-4(a)(1) (1985). On appeal, Doe contends that the family court erred in denying Doe’s motion to suppress evidence of the results of the field sobriety tests administered to him because the procedures regarding those tests had not been adopted pursuant to rule-making directives of HRS Chapter 91, the Hawai‘i Administrative…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Town v. Land Use CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. KimHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Holdman v. OlimHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Doe v. ChangHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. FedakHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ToyomuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. NishiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Wood v. State Personnel Bd.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  4. State v. ClaunchHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Green Party of Hawaii v. Nago.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API