Legal Opinion

State v. Kim

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1985No. 10594; CRIMINAL NOS. T85-11, T85-11APublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HAYASHI, J.

Defendant-Appellant Randall W. Kim (hereinafter “Kim”) appeals convictions for driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (hereinafter “HRS”) § 291-4(a)(1) (Supp. 1984) 1 and for refusing to submit to a breath or blood test in violation of HRS § 286-155 (Supp. 1984). 2 The sole issue on appeal is whether the police illegally obtained incriminating evidence in violation of Kim’s rights under article I, section 7 of the Hawaii Constitution when a police officer ordered Kim out of his car after a traffic stop…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. KalunaHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. WyattHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. KubaHawaii Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. GonsalvesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Baehr v. LewinHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. LopezHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API