Legal Opinion

Doe v. Chang

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1977No. 6261PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by three welfare recipient plaintiffs from an order denying injunctive relief from investigation and prosecution for welfare fraud, in an action against officers of the Department of Social Services and Housing (DSSH). We affirm.

The action was maintained by two individuals identified only by the pseudonyms John Doe and Jane Doe, 1 who were being investigated by DSSH for alleged welfare fraud, and one Cheryl Soto 2 who, according to her affidavit in the record, was informed that she was suspected of welfare fraud and had seen a penal summons charging her with that offense.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. SantiagoHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Aguiar v. Hawaii Housing AuthorityHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. KalaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Crosby v. State of Hawai'i Department of Budget & FinanceHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Waugh v. University of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. PattersonHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  4. City of Hartford v. PowersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Service Employees International Union v. Idaho Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API