Legal Opinion
Horenian v. Washington
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 19, 2011No. AC 32281PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, J.
The plaintiff, Mark Horenian, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, Marcel D. Washington and the city of Hartford (city), on all six counts of his revised complaint. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that several genuine issues of material fact exist and, therefore, that the court improperly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. 1 We dismiss the appeal in part and affirm the judgment of the trial court in part.
The following facts and procedural history, as alleged by the plaintiff and reasonably garnered from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- In Re Jorden R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Plato Associates, LLC v. Environmental Compliance Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- STANCUNA v. SchafferConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Green v. YANKEE GAS CORP.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cohen v. ROLL-A-COVER, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Atelier Constantin Popescu, LLC v. JC Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Anghel v. Saint Francis Hospital & Medical CenterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Stamatopoulos v. ECS North America, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Bomberov. BomberoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.