Legal Opinion
Eash v. Pence
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 13, 1926No. 16001PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
- LESTER, J.
The parties to this action will be referred to as they appeared in the district court.
The plaintiff brought suit against the de-. fendants to recover the sum of $3,000, with interest thereon, on a certain promissory note executed by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff. This note was secured by a mortgage on certain real estate located in the city of Tulsa, Okla., and the plaintiff in his petition asked for a foreclosure of said mortgage. The defendants filed separate answers, in which 'they admitted the execution of said note and mortgage mentioned in plaintiff’s petition, but…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Moore v. StantonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Piekenbrock v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
3Cited by10 opinions
- Diamond v. Union Bank and Trust of BartlesvilleDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1991
- I.C. Gas Amcana, Inc. v. HoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Brummett v. McGowanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. DearmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Bair v. Spokane Savings BankWashington Supreme Court · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.