Legal Opinion
In Re the Accounting of the Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 11, 1933PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Crane, J.’
The rule of Matter of Osborne (209 N. Y. 450) has again arisen in this case to perplex us. Arthur T. Hagen died January 13, 1917, leaving a last will and testament in which he bequeathed the residue of his property to a trustee to pay the income to his wife for life and the principal on her death to his three grandchildren. The trustee (now the Bochester Trust and Safe Deposit Company) set up the trust as of the date of the testator’s death at which time 814 shares of the General Baking Company constituted part of the principal. Actually there was at first 700 shares, subsequently…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of OsborneNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- United States Trust Co. v. . HeyeNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Bourne v. BourneNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of CanfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Baker v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re Trust Under Will of ClarkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- In re the Accounting of Security Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1950
- Birmingham v. CongerMississippi Supreme Court · 1969
- In re the Estate of TalbotNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- Langdell v. DodgeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1956
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.