Legal Opinion

Langdell v. Dodge

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 6, 1956No. 4447PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The first question we shall consider is whether the testator intended to give to the remaindermen all income received by the life tenant and unexpended by her at the time of her death or whether it became hers absolutely so that it goes to her heirs. This is not a case where the testator’s intent is plain from the language used (cf. McAllister v. Hayes, 76 N. H. 108, 111), but is one in which that intent must be determined by a balance of probabilities. Romprey v. Brothers, 95 N. H. 258, 260; Colony v. Colony, 97 N. H. 386, 391. In so doing it seems that certain salient facts appear. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. In Re the Accounting of OsborneNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Minot v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. In Re the Accounting of the Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stephan v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  2. Norvell EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. In Re Trust Under Will of ArensSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  4. Waid v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  5. In Re Estate of ValiquetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API