Legal Opinion

Bourne v. Bourne

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1925PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

No more perplexing problem comes before us-than the proper apportionment between capital and income of extraordinary dividends where the trust estate contains corporate stock and its creator has not expressed his wishes. The division made elsewhere has the merit of simplicity and certainty. Yet we have deliberately adopted what we conceive to be the more equitable rule, although it may involve the separate consideration of' every case, with varying results fitting varying circumstances. In so doing we have been influenced by the public policy of the State as indicated by statutes affecting…

2Cited by39 opinions

  1. Equitable Trust Co. v. PrenticeNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Hayes v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  3. People Ex Rel. Clark v. GilchristNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. In Re the Accounting of the United States Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Levin v. Mississippi River Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API