Legal Opinion

In re Maroney

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1917No. 10,158PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Industrial Board of Indiana. Certified questions of law. Proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Act in the matter of one Maroney. Certified questions of law by the Industrial Board.

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.

— The Industrial Board has certified for our decision the questions of law hereinafter indicated based on a statement of facts, which, so far as pertinent and necessary to the decisions of said questions is in substance as follows: On and prior to *334January 24, 1917, the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company, known as the “Big Four” Railway Company, owned and operated a line of railroad extending from Cincinnati, Ohio, through the State of Indiaua, to the city of Chicago, in the State of Illinois. On said day, and for several years previous thereto, Martin C. Maroney was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. United Paperboard Co. v. LewisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Lamphere v. Oregon R. & Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
  4. Walker v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moore v. J. A. McNulty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Whaley v. STEUBEN CTY. RURAL EL. MEMB. CORP.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Universal Portland Cement Co. v. SpirakisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Whaley v. Steuben County Rural Electric Membership Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API