Whitelaw v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KELLER, J.,
delivered the unanimous opinion of the Court.
The issue in this case is whether a trial court is required by statute to order a presentence investigation report (PSI) in a felony case when the defendant requests one. We hold that the court is required to do so.
A jury found appellant guilty of felony theft. After the jury delivered its verdict, the following took place:
MR. LAMBRIGHT [defense counsel]: Judge, just for the record’s sake, could I just at this point make my objection as to the presentence investigation?
THE COURT: Yes. Let the record show while the jury was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Rocha v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- State v. HardyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Turner v. McDonaldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Ex Parte GravesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Fryer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Jagaroo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Yarbrough v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.