Legal Opinion

Whitelaw v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 11, 2000No. 0352-00PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KELLER, J.,

delivered the unanimous opinion of the Court.

The issue in this case is whether a trial court is required by statute to order a presentence investigation report (PSI) in a felony case when the defendant requests one. We hold that the court is required to do so.

A jury found appellant guilty of felony theft. After the jury delivered its verdict, the following took place:

MR. LAMBRIGHT [defense counsel]: Judge, just for the record’s sake, could I just at this point make my objection as to the presentence investigation?

THE COURT: Yes. Let the record show while the jury was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Rocha v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. State v. HardyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. State Ex Rel. Turner v. McDonaldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GravesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Fryer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Jagaroo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. Yarbrough v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API