Legal Opinion

State v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 14, 1994No. 91C-20315; CA A80093Published

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Defendant appeals from the sentence imposed after we remanded his conviction for robbery in the first degree for resentencing. State v. Campbell, 117 Or App 362, 842 P2d 815 (1992). When defendant was originally sentenced on the robbery conviction, he also had been convicted of assault. However, the assault conviction was entered after the date of the robbery, and the trial court refused to consider the assault in defendant’s criminal history when sentencing for the robbery. Although the court found that defendant came within grid block 9 C, it imposed a determinate sentence under ORS…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BucholzOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. HaydonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API