Legal Opinion

Harrisburg Dairies, Inc. v. Eisaman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 10, 1940No. Appeal, 2PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

Appellant, Harrisburg Dairies, Inc., filed a bill in equity attacking the validity of Article Y, section 501, of the Milk Control Law of 1937, Act of April 28, 1937, P. L. 417, requiring milk dealers to post either a surety or collateral bond with the Milk Control Commission conditioned for the payment by the dealer for milk purchased from producers, on constitutional grounds, and asking that the Milk Control Commission be restrained from enforcing its provisions.

A preliminary injunction was granted and was subsequently continued until final hearing, whereupon…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Chastleton Corp. v. SinclairSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. HeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Rohrer v. Milk Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Gilbraith's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morris v. FeatroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Johnson v. Commissioner of AgricultureMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Swick v. Tarentum Borough School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Milk Control Commission v. Paulishak, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1941
  5. Milk Control Commission v. Valleywood Milk Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API