Legal Opinion

Prime Financial Group, Inc. v. Smith

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 13, 1993No. 92-307PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The defendant, Edward H. Smith, appeals the Superior Court’s (Manias, J.) decision entering judgment against him as the guarantor of certain lease agreements made by the plaintiff, Prime Financial Group, Inc. (Prime Financial), and a third party. He argues that judgment should not be entered unless Prime Financial, the lessor under the agreements, produces the original leases and *75files them with the superior court, in accordance with Superior Court Rule 77. We affirm, holding that Prime Financial need not file the original leases because the guaranties contained in them are not negotiable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. HardtDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1986
  2. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. GallowayDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1985
  3. Brooks v. United Kentucky BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ingram v. EarthmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  2. Business Development Dept. v. HuttenbauerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Vesta State Bank v. Independent State Bank of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Vesta State Bank v. Independent State Bank of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API