Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Hardt

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided October 23, 1986No. 85-3553PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ORDER

MILLS, District Judge:

Is the guarantor discharged from liability where the creditor fails to perfect its security interest in the collateral?

No.

Summary judgment for Plaintiff.

This suit is brought by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), in its corporate capacity. The FDIC seeks to collect on a note and related guaranty which it purchased from the receiver of an insolvent bank. Dennis Hardt is the maker of the note and Theodore Hardt is the guarantor of the note. The first count seeks collection against the maker and the second count predicates liability on the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Braemoor AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. National Acceptance Co. of America v. WechslerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
  5. Ishak v. Elgin National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. P.L.M. International, Inc., Antonio Melendez and Martha MelendezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  2. Pemstein v. StimpsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  3. ITT Industrial Credit Co. v. D.S. America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
  4. Continental Bank N.A. v. EverettDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  5. Morris v. Columbia National Bank of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API