Legal Opinion · Dissent

Elam v. Workers' Compensation Court of Oklahoma

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1983No. 54933Published

1DissentOpala, Justice

At issue here is the constitutional validity of a provision in 85 O.S.1981 § 3.6 which requires the employer who seeks appellate review of an award made against him by the Workers’ Compensation Court to post a surety bond for the payment of the amount finally to be determined, together with interest and costs. The bond is a “jurisdictional prerequisite to judicial review.”1 Twice in the last two years this court upheld the statutory requirement here in contest.2 Neither of these decisions comes to grips with the infirmity claims being pressed upon us here. Because I am persuaded that the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. McKeever Drilling Co. v. EgbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Moses v. HoebelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Texas Oklahoma Express v. SorensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API