Legal Opinion
Miniken v. Walter
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided August 26, 1997No. CS-96-407-JLQPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ' DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
QUACKENBUSH, Senior District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT are the parties’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment, heard without oral argument on August 20, 1997. Michael W. Gendler appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Colleen B. Evans appeared on behalf of the Defendants. Having reviewed the record, and being fully advised in this matter, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED for the following reasons.
FACTUAL…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Afshin Bahrampour v. R.O. Lampert, Superintendent Debbie Holland Teresa Hicks Kathy StevensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Prison Legal News v. LehmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Morrison v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Frost v. SymingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Frost v. SymingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.