Legal Opinion
Johnson v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 16, 2010No. 09-620CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.
Before the Court are Defendant’s December 17, 2009 motion for judgment on the administrative record (“Def.’s Mot.”) and pro se Plaintiffs January 12, 2010 cross-motion for judgment on the administrative record (“Pl.’s Mot.”), filed pursuant to Rule 52.1(c) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Plaintiff Martin H. Johnson served on active duty in the United States Navy (“Navy”) from 1975 until his voluntary separation in 1993, two years before he would have qualified for permanent retirement and disability benefits. In December 1990, a military…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Victoria M. Voge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Bernard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Peterson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Ward v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Rob W. Frey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Stein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.