Legal Opinion
Peterson v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 29, 2012No. 10-664 CPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
Plaintiff sustained injuries while serving on active duty in the M’izona Mr National Guard. He brings this suit alleging that the United States Mr Force (“Mr Force”) assigned him an erroneous disability rating, wrongfully discharged him from service, and denied him back pay. The parties filed cross-motions for judgment upon the administrative record pursuant to Rule 52.1 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) related to Count II of the complaint. Thereafter, defendant filed a motion for partial dismissal pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(6)…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State of North Carolina Business Enterprises Program v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Rob W. Frey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Wollman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Grooms v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Kareem R. Rock v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.