Legal Opinion

Clippinger v. Reiss

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 1936No. Civ. 1989PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him as a result of a collision between himself, a pedestrian, and an automobile which was being operated by defendant. Trial of the action before a jury resulted in the return of a verdict in plaintiff’s favor in the amount of $7,500. Judgment was entered in conformity with the verdict. Defendant then moved for a new trial. The motion was granted on the sole ground that the evidence was insufficient to justify the verdict. Plaintiff appeals from the order granting a new trial.

Appellant contends that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Lewis v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fisher v. ZimmermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Tice v. Kaiser Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Nance v. Fresno City Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Shurman v. Fresno Ice Rink Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Prescott v. City of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API