Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Penny v. Titus, National Union Fire Insurance Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 5, 1995No. 85091Published

1Concurrence

ADAMS, Judge,

specially concurring:

I concur fully in Judge Hansen’s opinion. I write to discuss what some might perceive as a discrepancy between my vote in this case and my vote to approve certain language in Kerr Glass v. Hepler, 902 P.2d 1126 (Okla.App.1995) which I now find troubling. In Kerr, we faced the issue of which insurance carriers should be responsible for disability from a cumulative trauma hearing loss. Although we remanded the case to the trial court after recognizing the possibility of apportioning liability between insurance carriers “if competent evidence supports such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kerr Glass Co. v. WilsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Parks v. Kerr GlassCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Kerr Glass v. HeplerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API