Legal Opinion
SALOMON SA v. Rossignol Ski Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 22, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-246-CMWPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CALEB M. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.
This is an action for patent infringement involving ski boots. Plaintiffs Salomon S.A. and Solomon/North America, Inc. (collectively “Salomon”) filed suit on May 17, 1988, against defendants Rossignol Ski Company, Inc., Skis Rossignol S.A., Caber Italia S.p.A., Trappeur-Kerma USA and Trappeur (collectively “Rossignol”). In its Complaint, Salomon alleges that defendants directly or contributorily infringed, or induced the infringement of, one or more claims of the eleven patents cited in the Complaint.
Presently before the Court is defendant…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Quad Environmental Technologies Corporation v. Union Sanitary District, and A.P.T., Inc., a California Corp. D/B/A Calvert Environmental, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991