Legal Opinion
Naiser v. Unilever United States, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided September 30, 2013No. Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-00395-JHMPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
JOSEPH H. McKINLEY, JR., Chief Judge.
Terri Naiser and Jonnie Phillips, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”), bring this putative class action against Unilever United States, Inc. (“Unilever”); LEK Inc. (“LEK”); and Conopeo, Inc., d/b/a Unilever Home & Personal Care USA (“Conopeo”). Plaintiffs’ action arises out of their purchase and use of a hair product which was marketed and sold as Suave® Professionals Keratin Infusion 30 Day Smoothing Kit. (See Am. Compl. [DN 1-2] ¶ 1.)
Presently, this matter is before the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- League of United Latin American Citizens v. BredesenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Association of Cleveland Fire Fighters v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Schechner v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Bosch v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2014
- Sims v. Atrium Med. Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2018
- Yonts v. Easton Technical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Taylor v. Southwire Tools & EquipmentDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.