Newberry v. Bank of Princeton
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from a decree of the Corporation Court of the city of Radford, pronounced June 16, 1899, in a suit in chancery therein pending, wherein the appellee was the complainant, and the appellant and others were the defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.
One of the objects of this suit was to set aside a conveyance of land made by James H. Mustard and wife to Henry New-berry, the appellant, upon the ground that it was executed to hinder, delay, and defraud the creditors of the male grantor. Hpon the hearing of the cause, the court was of opinion that the deed was executed by the grantor, James IT. Mustard, with the fraudulent intent charged, and that the grantee, Newberry, “had knowledge of the existence of such facts as would have put him on enquiry as to such fraudulent intent, and therefore warrants the court in holding him responsible for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ferguson & Co. v. DaughtreySupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cochran v. ParisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
- Flook v. Armentrout's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
- Bridgewater Roller Mills Co. v. StroughSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
- Garrett v. FinchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
- Copperthite v. Loudoun National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.