Flook v. Armentrout's Adm'r
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Rockingham county, pronounced February IT, 1902, in a suit in chancery, wherein the appellee, Augustine Armentrout, administrator of Daniel Armentrout, deceased, was the complainant, and the appellants and another were the defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
By deed dated December 6, 1877, Daniel Elook conveyed to his three daughters—Eliza Flook, Martha Elook, and Frances E. Yancey—all of his real and personal property, consisting of a farm in Rockingham county, containing about four hundred' acres, and the personal property owned by the grantor, consisting of horses, cattle, hogs, farming implements, and household and kitchen furniture, subject to the contingent dower rights of his wife in the real estate. This deed was acknowledged January 14, 1878, and recorded February 26, 1878. The consideration for the conveyance expressed on its face is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williams v. Lord & RobinsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
- Fischer v. LeeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
- Bresee v. BradfieldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1901
- American Net & Twine Co. v. MayoSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
- Newberry v. Bank of PrincetonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hyman v. Porter (In Re Porter)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1984
- Crowder v. CrowderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Deeds v. GilmerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Gold v. Laines (In Re Laines)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Atkinson v. SolenbergerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.