Legal Opinion

Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Company v. Oklahoma

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 6, 1996No. 94-6325PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

83 F.3d 1219

133 Oil & Gas Rep. 353, Util. L. Rep. P 14,108

PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPELINE COMPANY; Northwest Central

Pipeline Corporation; ANR Pipeline Company; Natural Gas

Pipeline Company of America; Mississippi River Transmission

Corporation; KN Energy, Inc.; Public Service Company of

Oklahoma; Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, a division of

Tenneco, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees,

Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Amoco Production Company;

Anadarko Production Company; Apache Corporation; CNG

Producing Company, Cities Service Oil & Gas Corporation;

Cotton Petroleum Corporation; Mobil Oil Corporation;

Mustang…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schneidewind v. ANR Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. State Corporation Comm'n of Kan.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Interstate Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bishop v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. Local 514, Transport Workers of America v. KeatingDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2002
  3. Stein v. Sprint Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
  4. Shafer v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2015
  5. Mayo v. Kaiser-Francis Oil Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API