Legal Opinion
Mayo v. Kaiser-Francis Oil Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 5, 1998No. 89662PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOPLIN, Judge:
¶ 1 Appellants as owners of mineral interests underlying Sections 20 and 29, Township 6 North, Range 8 West, Grady County, Oklahoma, seek review of the trial court’s order refusing to certify as a class all royalty owners, excess royalty owners, and working interest owners in Sections 19, 20, and 29 in Appellants’ action against Kaiser-Francis Oil Company as operator of several wells and owner of a small leasehold interest in Sections 20 and 29, and Texas Southwest Gas Corporation and/or Senex Pipeline Co., the contractual purchaser of the gas from the wells and asserted…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tara Petroleum Corp. v. HugheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Mattoon v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Schaffner v. Chemical BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Shell Oil Company v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Baltimore Football Club, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- FIRST PRYORITY BANK v. MOONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- Mayo v. Kaiser-Francis Oil Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998