Legal Opinion
Hullett v. Smiedendorf
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided June 11, 1999No. 1:98-cv-00273PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Levarst Hullett, Jr. (“Hullett”), has sued Defendants Rick Smiedendorf (“Smiedendorf’), Steve Neubecker (“Neu-becker”), and the City of St. Joseph (“St.Joseph”), for violation of his civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983,1985, and 1986. Hullett also raises state law claims of assault and battery and gross negligence. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion in Limine. 1
Facts
Hullett, a forty-two year old black male from Benton Harbor, Michigan, rode his bicycle to the neighboring city of St. Joseph,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- West v. DuncanDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
- Granger v. KleinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Hearns Concrete Construction Co. v. City of YpsilantiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Nelson v. City of Madison HeightsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- Lyons v. Franklin County, KentuckyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.