Legal Opinion

West v. Duncan

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided December 14, 2001No. 5:01-cv-01168PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GWIN, District Judge.

On October 23, 2001, Defendants City of Aurora Mayor Margaret L. Duncan, Police Chief Gerald Dietrich, Sergeant Scott Gar-an, Patrolman Robert Hagquist, and Patrolman Michael Wadlington moved for summary judgment [Docs. 60-61]. Plaintiffs Sathena West, Ciera West, and Tye-rell West oppose the motions. Because the Court holds that the plaintiffs have failed to show a constitutional violation and that the defendants are entitled to qualified immunity, the Court grants the defendants’ motions for summary judgment.

I. Background

In this case, the plaintiffs claim that…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. CoplinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. HareDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2004
  3. Gaddis Ex Rel. Gaddis v. Redford TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  4. Ahmed v. Ohio State Highway PatrolDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
  5. In the Matter of Property Seized From Robert Pardee, Robert PardeeCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API