Legal Opinion

Pierog v. H. F. Karl Contractors, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 14, 1976No. 62832PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Counterplaintiffs appeal from the dismissal of their counterclaim which sought declaratory and injunctive relief against the Village of Riverside. Counterplaintiffs alleged in their counterclaim that a provision of the Village’s zoning ordinance requiring 2200 square feet of lot area per living unit is unconstitutional as applied to an apartment building located at 89 Lincoln Avenue, Riverside, Illinois. The trial court ruled that the counterclaim was barred by a prior judgment of “guilty” entered against the counterplaintiffs in a quasi-criminal action brought by the Village for violating…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The People v. KiddIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  2. City of Elmhurst v. KegerreisIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  4. Schoenbrod v. RosenthalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  5. Kaufman v. Somers Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Morris v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Torcasso v. Standard Outdoor Sales, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Joseph Hagee, Reed Mitchell Hagee and Raymond Jump v. City of Evanston, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Redfern v. SullivanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Rotogravure Service, Inc. v. R. W. Borrowdale Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API