Legal Opinion
General Motors Corporation v. Rubsam Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 19, 1933No. 6137PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.
The defendants in the court below appeal from a decree finding that certain structures manufactured by them prior to April 21, 1928, embodied the inventions of Letters Patent No. 1,395,362, issued to Charles F. Rub-sam, November 1, 1921, and Nos. 1,576,225 and 1,576,226, issued to the same patentee on March 9,1926; that for that reason plaintiffs were entitled to recover stipulated royalties under a license agreement entered into May 4, 1923, and terminated April 21, 1928; and that the above-mentioned patents were valid in respect to the claims in suit, 1 and were…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Shaffer v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Excelsior Wooden Pipe Co. v. Pacific Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Tulare Irrigation District v. ShepardSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Sol A. Dann, John H. Neville and Louise A. Turek v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Harold E. Churchill, Hugh J. Ferry, and A. J. PortaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Super Products Corporation, a Wisconsin Corporation v. D P Way Corporation, a Wisconsin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Williams Mfg. Co. v. United Shoe MacH. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Oliver United Filters, Inc. v. SilverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Gate-Way, Inc. v. HillgrenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.